The problem with explaining ourselves - besides the fact that we are, you know, having to explain ourselves for heaven's sake - is that we are actually appearing to accept the conservative premise. It's almost as though we're saying that we agree that having sex is wrong, using birth control for safe sex is wrong, and that we should still have access to it because we're using it for what are legitimate (ie non sex-related) purposes.Blink. Actually, most people I know on birth control are using it to ensure they don't get pregnant when they have sex. Which seems perfectly reasonable, rational, and frankly responsible, at least to me. So why all the excuses? The problem is no better illustrated than in Nicole Neroulias' recent well-meaning but flawed Huffington Post piece, entitled "I Was a Virgin on Birth Control." She writes:
As a teenager, I had debilitating menstrual cycles, but the perceived stigma of going on the pill deterred me from getting the help I needed. I finally started taking it in college, as a virgin with no foreseeable pregnancy panic . . . Since then, my mother and sister have also taken the pill on medical grounds, as have dozens of our relatives and friends. We're talking about a well-established legal medication routinely prescribed for a range of symptoms and sicknesses."Why is she telling me that she was a virgin? Why is she telling me that she wasn't having sex? She doesn't need to qualify, or justify, her use of birth control. Neither should any of the other women who commented on her post, saying that they, also, were not having sex, or even worse, were virgins, when they started using birth control. This just feeds into the same old problem we've always had - trying to make ourselves appear just as morally superior as our conservative, anti-women fanatic enemies. I don't care that Nicole was not having sex. I definitely don't care that she was a virgin. This qualification is especially problematic to me because she's really hitting hard on the moral high ground here. She might as well have said "I agree with you conservatives so much about women and sex that I even agree with you about the importance of women's virginities. I was a virgin! Leave me alone!" Shudder. Women need to stop doing this. We all do, in fact. Because the truth is that I have not come across any conservatives who want to deny women access to birth control who would change their minds if they heard that a small portion of women were using it for anything other than sex. All they would do, I'm convinced, is enter an "exception clause." They'd write a law that said women shouldn't have access to birth control unless they need it for non sex-related, medical reasons. Want to know how I know? They've already started. The Arizona legislature has just advanced a bill that would require women to provide employers with a doctor's note saying they are seeking birth control coverage from their health insurance plan for medical conditions unrelated to pregnancy prevention. What could be next? As Nicole put it,
How would [Catholic leaders] have their institutions apply these directives? . . . Would ovarian cysts and infertility make the cut, but acne and bad cramps be more along the lines of God's will? And what if religious authorities and their hospitals disagree on these theories in practice, as they have in cases of abortion to save a woman's life?"I'm all for trying to compromise with people in theory, but the truth is, we always end up getting the short end of the stick. I don't agree with the idea that women shouldn't be having sex, I don't agree with expecting women to justify their use of medicine, and I don't agree with anyone except a woman and her doctor legally having anything to do with a woman's health care. If we try to cede the battle, we will most definitely lose the war. Photo Credit: MartinAK15 via Creative Commons License.