‘The Avengers,’ Strong Female Characters and Failing the Bechdel Test

Smashing box office records, audiences have been swept up in The Avengers hullabaloo. Interesting and compelling, the epic superhero film based on the Marvel comics unites Black Widow, Captain America, Iron Man, Hawkeye, the Hulk and Thor “to form a team that must stop Thor’s brother Loki from enslaving the human race.” It was good. Really good. It contained complex characters and funny, clever dialogue. In a genre that exhibits strong female characters yet often objectifies women’s bodies or reduces them to ancillary love interests…how was The Avengers’ portrayal of women?

With Joss Whedon, a proud feminist and Equality Now supporter, at the helm directing and screenwriting, I eagerly hoped for a feminist film. I absolutely adore Firefly, only watched a handful of Buffy episodes (I know, I know…I need to watch more), and I couldn’t stand Dollhouse (don’t even get me started on the predication of rape, objectification and misogyny…but I digress). Forever inspired by his radical feminist mother and his love for X-Men character Kitty Pryde, Whedon shows an adept talent for creating and writing strong female characters.

The lone female Avenger is Natasha Romanoff, aka Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson), a “highly trained spy,” assassin and martial arts master. Haunted by a dark past, she’s a fearless warrior possessing a razor sharp mind and an impressive knack for interrogation. In one of the best scenes, she goes head to head with the film’s villainous nemesis Loki (and Thor’s brother) in a labyrinthine mind game. While I’m not thrilled that Black Widow uses “feminine wiles” as a method of manipulation, her opponents anticipate vulnerability in her because of her gender. Natasha deftly uses and exploits their stereotypical gender biases to her advantage.

Black Widow could have easily become a one dimensional character. Yet she embodies strength and depth. She’s decisive and forever in control of her emotions. She’s not technically a superhero (nor is her partner archer Hawkeye) as she doesn’t have special powers. Yet she arguably had the best fighting sequences with her nimble and dexterous prowess. There’s one where she’s tied to a chair and kicks ass…it’s seriously amazing! Johansson talked about how she would be delighted to do a Black Widow film in the realm and style of The Bourne Series. That sounds freaking awesome.

In most films and TV series, the media objectifies and commodifies women’s bodies for the male gaze, reducing a woman to her sexuality. While she dons tight costumes, that doesn’t happen here. She’s not merely a sex object. Black Widow is an integral part of the team. She’s the one who thinks they should all work together when petty arguments and inflated egos threaten to divide them.  Black Widow plays with gender stereotypes but doesn’t wield her sexuality as a weapon. She uses her ridiculously impressive martial arts ass-kicking skills for that.

 

 

Aside from Black Widow, The Avengers film depicts S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent Maria Hill (Cobie Smulders, my favorite actor on HIMYM) and two brief scenes with Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow). Maria is one of S.H.I.E.L.D. Director Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson)’s Chief Lieutenants. She’s calm, collected and authoritative, even in dangerous situations. We see Maria run the deck of the S.H.I.E.L.D. Helicarrier. But she doesn’t approve of controlling people as we see when she criticizes Fury for manipulating The Avengers’ emotions to finagle a specific response. Pepper is the CEO of Stark Industries (Iron Man/Tony Stark’s company), as well as his girlfriend. She’s intelligent, precise, organized and charming.

When asked about Whedon’s strong female characters, Johansson called him “gender blind:”

“He wants his female characters to be dynamic and competitive and assured and confident. And it has nothing to do with anything but the fact that he just celebrates those kinds of strong female characters.”

AlterNet’s Julianne Escobedo Shepherd thinks The Avengers possesses a “stark feminist perspective” as it differs from so many other superhero films. Even in movies with multiple female characters like X-Men, the women often orbit the male characters. Not so in The Avengers. Escobedo Shepherd goes further asserting Johansson portrays Black Widow’s “talent for manipulation as a boon for the art of spying, rather than any kind of femme fatale cliché.”

Despite three strong female characters and Black Widow’s awesomeness, I didn’t find the movie overtly feminist. I can’t help but wonder if people are looking to find feminism where not a whole lot actually exists because of Whedon’s reputation. The Avengers contains some gender problems.

Loki hurls a misogynistic insult at Black Widow, calling her a “mewling quim.” Translation, a “whining cunt.” Lovely. He reduces her to her vagina. Now, not everyone’s going to get the inference right away. I know I didn’t. Although something about the condescending tone made me suspect a gendered insult. Whedon says he often “abuses” language, depicting different vernaculars, including Shakespearan dialogue, to reveal character traits. It’s interesting that instead of writing an overt insult, Whedon subversively portrayed Loki’s sexism.

Some people apparently accused Whedon of “not being macho enough” to direct the superhero bonanza. So let me get this straight. If a guy is a proud feminist and writes strong female characters, that makes him unmanly to direct an action movie? And what does that say about women…that female directors possess too much estrogen to direct? Ugh.

Even though many critics and bloggers have focused on the Hulk, thanks in large part to Mark Ruffalo’s fantastic talent and the hilarious snarky dialogue, thanks to Robert Downey Jr.’s quick wit as Iron Man. Interestingly, of the 6 Avengers, Black Widow gets the 3rd most screen time. Yet she still remains the only female Avenger in the film. And that’s a problem.

 

 

In the comics, The Avengers had a rotating line-up of superheroes. Couldn’t the movie portray an additional female Avenger, like Wasp or Scarlet Witch or She-Hulk? Maybe they didn’t want two green Hulks. Fair enough. Although She-Hulk, a brilliant attorney, is pretty badass. Whedon even said that when they weren’t sure if they could accommodate Scarlett Johansson’s tight schedule, an early script contained the female superhero (and founding Avenger) Wasp. He “fell in love with the character.”

So here’s my question: why did they have to scrap the role of Wasp the minute they secured Johansson’s Black Widow? Why not have 2 female superheroes in one film?? Sadly, the movie suffers from the Smurfette Principle.

Coined by feminist writer Katha Pollitt in looking at children’s entertainment, the Smurfette Principle is when a male ensemble features one female character. Think the Smurfs (before the introduction of Sassy), the Muppets and Voltron (I’m clearly showing I’m a child of the 80s here). Pollitt asserts that the problem with this trope is that “boys define the group, its story and its code of values. Girls exist only in relation to boys.” As the articulate Anita Sarkeesian at Feminist Frequency points out, it transcends children’s entertainment as we see in films like Star Wars, Star Trek, Watchmen and even Inception as well as TV shows like early seasons of Big Bang Theory and It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia.

Films and TV relegate women to “sidekicks or sexy decorations.” Luckily, Black Widow suffers neither of these fates. She holds her own as a fierce and capable character, neither shoved aside nor reduced to a dude’s love interest. But it’s still problematic that Black Widow is the only female team member. The male Avengers contain multiple male personalities: a sarcastic genius playboy, a lonely selfless soldier, a skilled sniper, and a tortured brilliant scientist. But as far as women’s representation, there’s just one female Avenger. Granted, she’s a badass. But it would have been nice to see more diverse personalities…which might have been rectified with another female superhero.

But my biggest problem? No women talked to each other. At all. What the hell is up with that??

Like Film School Rejects’ Gwenn Reyes, I too found the glaring lack of women talking to each other to be The Avengersgreatest flaw.” Maria talks to the other Avengers. As Nick Fury’s right-hand person, it makes sense she would interact with the Avengers. Plus Maria and Natasha have probably crossed paths before since Black Widow already worked for S.H.I.E.L.D. Couldn’t the two women have talked about the upcoming battle? Or strategized, commiserated…anything??

Just because the portrayals of the female characters were positive, doesn’t mean I think the movie smashed the Bechdel Test, a simple test that asks that two named female characters talk to each other about something other than men. With women comprising only 33% of speaking roles on-screen, The Avengers failing the Bechdel Test proves the cavernous gender gap in film and how far we still need to go.

Let me be clear. Most movies — superhero or otherwise — couldn’t care less about portraying complex, intelligent, strong, dimensional women or gender equitable roles. So The Avengers is a step in the right direction. But if you only depict your two female characters (no matter how empowered they are) talking to men, it subtly reinforces the notion that women’s lives revolve around men.

While it’s a really good action movie with strong female roles, I still expected more feminism from you, Joss Whedon.

 

Megan Kearns is a blogger, freelance writer and activist. A feminist vegan, Megan blogs at The Opinioness of the World, where she writes about gender in pop culture, sexism in the media, reproductive justice and living vegan. She is the first Monthly Guest Contributor featured at Bitch Flicks, reviewing films and TV series from a feminist lens. Megan’s work has also appeared at Arts & Opinion,Feministing’s Community Blog, ItalianieuropeiOpen Letters Monthly, and A Safe World for Women. She earned her B.A. in Anthropology and Sociology and a Graduate Certificate in Women and Politics and Public Policy. Megan lives in Boston with more books than she will probably ever read in her lifetime.

 

This post was originally published on Bitch Flicks and is cross-posted with permission.

Photo Credit Marvel 2011 via IMDB.com

Photo Credit Marvel 2011 via IMDB.com

Facebook Twitter Email

Tags: , , , , ,

  • Pingback: ‘The Avengers,’ Strong Female Characters and Failing the Bechdel Test | The Opinioness of the World

  • Dara Crawley

    The problem with Scarlett Witch and her brother is she is in limbo because while they are most often associated with the Avenger, they are also mutants, and thus belong to two different companies. Same reason why Spider-man can’t be in The avenger’s movie. Sony own Spider-man, and Fox owns all mutant related properties in film form. Watch this  for a better explanation: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/the-big-picture/5685-Wrongs-Rights

    I think to an extent the problem is most of the female characters are  related to male characters and they were trying to avoid origin stories. Even Hawkeye and Black Widow are just in the world no detailed origin. If they used Ms. Marvel they would have to introduce the Skrull(the t’chari aliens) in depth. She-Hulk would be redundant, and Wasp is… useless and attached to a man. The movie did a wonderful job with the amount of characters it needed and limited itself to.

    I do wish there was another female character who was interesting, As problematic as it could be Ms. Marvel as Carol Danvers would be interesting and would create a character for Maria Hill to play off of.

    You have to look at it as a movie that had to have certain characters, and was trying to avoid origin stories. 

  • always intrigued

    “Loki hurls a misogynistic insult at Black Widow, calling her a “mewling quim.” Translation, a “whining cunt.” Lovely. He reduces her to her vagina. Now, not everyone’s going to get the inference right away.”

    Villains may be villains, wanting to conquer/destroy/enslave the world and this sort of thing… but a villain being mysogynistic, that’s unnaceptable! That sets up a bad example for persons who aspire to be real-world villains.

  • Nayrbarr

    You make some good points above, but there are a few major issues, such as when you put a mark against the film because Loki calls Black Widow a “mewling quim”. You need to remember one thing about Loki: He’s a cunt. (No, that isn’t misogynistic, “cunt” is a rather generic insult which happens to fit his character. Using the work “dick” of “bastard” would make little difference, but I’m getting off topic) That’s seriously an important part of his character, he’s literally cursed to be like that. The whole point of that “attack” is to establish this. One can’t accuse the film of being misogynistic because one of the characters is unpleasant, as you seem to here.

    In regards to not putting more female Avenger in the film, you said:

    “Couldn’t the movie portray an additional female Avenger, like Wasp or Scarlet Witch or She-Hulk?”

    The wasp is (from what I know) a bit of a rubbish character. Particularly in the first Avengers comic, there is a genuinely sexist attitude towards her. Scarlet Witch couldn’t be in the film due to legal issues; it’s unclear who owns the “movie rights” to her character. I don’t know enough about She-Hulk to really comment on her, but having two Hulks in the film would seriously undermine the concept of a group of very different individuals coming together (which is fundamentally what the Avengers is about). It’s also important to remember that Thor, Iron Man and Hulk have already been established in Marvel films recently. Thus, Hawkeye would need to be removed for another female character to be added. I’m not intimate with Hawkeye myself, but I believe that removing him would have upset a lot of long-term Avengers fans (he seems to be quite popular).

    • Nayrbarr

      *”or “bastard”"

    • http://twitter.com/liliaeth Lore Krajsman

      And the problem with removing Hawkeye when the team already has four male characters is what exactly?

      I’d much rather have had Ms Marvel, whom I would love to see a seperate origin story for, or Wasp, who most definitely is NOT a rubish character. (Ms Marvel could have even had her origin story in the movie, make her a SHIELD agent instead of the airforce colonel she is in the comics and there’s a perfect set up. In fact, I would have loved to see her used in the past few movies instead of Coulson (yet another guy). Introduce her slowly and then have her gain her powers during the attack… would have been a perfect way to introduce her. As for Wasp. She’s a wealthy socialite, who’s far better at the business aspect than Tony is, and who’s a hero because she likes doing it and thinks it’s fun. No big explanations needed,) Add those two to Black Widow and wham, you have three female characters with three definitely different personalities. And no legal trouble in regards to characters linked to the other franchises. Seriously, you do NOT need Antman to introduce Wasp. Pym could always be introduced later in a Wasp movie as Janet’s boyfriend, in fact, I’ve always felt that her powers are cooler than his any day.

  • Jen Veldhuyzen

    See, I totally disagreed–Black Widow’s NOT a feminist icon. She’s every man’s stereotype of what an ‘awesome woman’ should be. She has NO personality outside of “I kick ass.” She’s a female Rambo–and we all know how much personality Rambo has. = / Her entire role in the movie is stereotypical female manipulation or mothering. When she’s being hardcore, she manipulates. When she’s relating with a man, she mothers. “Why can’t we all get along, children?” Even her fighting style is stereotypical of the femme fatale trope we all know and, unfortunately, love way too much.

    Strong ass-kicking DNE strong character. That is a standard created by misogynists. So you’re judging Black Widow’s strength of character by a male-defined standard.

    And here’s a bigger question for you–why no big female superhero video, with a big female superhero origin story, like we got for Thor, IronMan, Hulk, etc? Could they not have waited a LITTLE longer with the Avengers?

  • Jen Veldhuyzen

    Also, there are plenty of other female characters to throw in who AREN’T total losers in the Marvel comics (Black Widow’s always a stereotype and always a jerk). How about Photon? She’s not so well-known, but they could have changed that! And Wasp, a founding member, does NOT have to be related to a man (Ant-man doesn’t even have to show up until later). In fact, it would have been AWESOME to have a Wasp origin movie. If that origin movie HAD to have romance in it, it wouldn’t be tough to do it the way they did it with Spiderman–which would be awesome role reversal. She’s the hero, she’s awesome, she does her thing, and the love interest’s an auxiliary character that showcases her strengths.

    *Sigh* I like Wasp.